Browse
Add New
Tags & Countries
My Library
Account & App
Community
Add New
My Library
Account & App
Your saved activity and contributions
Sponsored
Ask structured questions, gather responses, and turn public opinion into useful signals.
Create surveyUse your account to vote, save members, and unlock more features.
No account yet? Register instead
Only moderators have access to these tools. We'll notify you when you're eligible to apply.
Moderator pages contain tools for reviewing reports, content, and administrative settings.
Eligibility is based on participation, quality contributions, guideline adherence, and reputation.
When you qualify, you'll get email or dashboard instructions to submit your application.
Engage, report issues, and help others—strong community contributions improve eligibility.
Essential storage and login support are always on. You can choose whether to allow ads and Google Analytics.
Essential storage and login support are always enabled. Ads can be turned off below.
Yup, definitely agree. Any big policy when reviewed by the real educated people, would benefit the decision making as well as stability of relations bw people and government.
Well, that's something that'll ONLY happen on further amends. Which atleast I wouldn't agree for. It'd be fixed for the people that fall under the current (or if in future, the fixed) tax slabs
Okay, I get your point. But, every outcome you listed is an extreme case. Going from TAXPAYER VOTE VALUES MORE -> HIGHER TAX EQUALS HIGHER VALUE -> DEGREE MEANS MORE COVERAGE TO STATEMENTS -> ECONOMICS EXPERT MEANS MORE SAY IN BUDGET -> PEOPLE CONTROLLING BUDGET ; it's a long chain. And also, Democracy is not a perfect system, there are flaws, and any country must follow the system that promises it's progress with minimal challenges, instead of being hellbent on one system. And this is one of the biggest flaws. "When a fool and a wise man hold the same amount of power, the society is bound to face hardships" - Greek philosophers. Which is true.
"The only way to relieve yourself off a distraction, is by creating a new productive one" Freebie politics is bad, we both agree, but you saying that this voting system will create another division in society is 90% wrong. For instance, have we ever heard two rich businessmen cancel a deal due to difference in identity like religion/caste/race or anything (if any, then Extremely Rare). So, why not create a division that brings people together. Classism is already there, you know it too, what I'm making is not a new category, but I'm bringing out the benefits of a division that isn't discriminatory to the extent of communal discrimination. Personally, what I inferred was attempts of removing inequality have created more hatred. I know a guy who doesn't like SC/ST category students, solely due to RESERVATIONS. He didn't had this hatred, until it came to entrance examinations and admissions in institutes. And there are many more like him.